Paper detail

Distributed Variable Sample-Size Gradient-response and Best-response Schemes for Stochastic Nash Equilibrium Problems over Graphs

This paper considers a stochastic Nash game in which each player minimizes an expectation valued composite objective. We make the following contributions. (I) Under suitable monotonicity assumptions on the concatenated gradient map, we derive optimal rate statements and oracle complexity bounds for the proposed variable sample-size proximal stochastic gradient-response (VS-PGR) scheme when the sample-size increases at a geometric rate. If the sample-size increases at a polynomial rate of degree $v > 0$, the mean-squared errordecays at a corresponding polynomial rate while the iteration and oracle complexities to obtain an $ε$-NE are $\mathcal{O}(1/ε^{1/v})$ and $\mathcal{O}(1/ε^{1+1/v})$, respectively. (II) We then overlay (VS-PGR) with a consensus phase with a view towards developing distributed protocols for aggregative stochastic Nash games. In the resulting scheme, when the sample-size and the consensus steps grow at a geometric and linear rate, computing an $ε$-NE requires similar iteration and oracle complexities to (VS-PGR) with a communication complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\ln^2(1/ε))$; (III) Under a suitable contractive property associated with the proximal best-response (BR) map, we design a variable sample-size proximal BR (VS-PBR) scheme, where each player solves a sample-average BR problem. Akin to (I), we also give the rate statements, oracle and iteration complexity bounds. (IV) Akin to (II), the distributed variant achieves similar iteration and oracle complexities to the centralized (VS-PBR) with a communication complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\ln^2(1/ε))$ when the communication rounds per iteration increase at a linear rate. Finally, we present some preliminary numerics to provide empirical support for the rate and complexity statements.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.