Paper detail

Distributed Strong Diameter Network Decomposition

For a pair of positive parameters $D,χ$, a partition ${\cal P}$ of the vertex set $V$ of an $n$-vertex graph $G = (V,E)$ into disjoint clusters of diameter at most $D$ each is called a $(D,χ)$ network decomposition, if the supergraph ${\cal G}({\cal P})$, obtained by contracting each of the clusters of ${\cal P}$, can be properly $χ$-colored. The decomposition ${\cal P}$ is said to be strong (resp., weak) if each of the clusters has strong (resp., weak) diameter at most $D$, i.e., if for every cluster $C \in {\cal P}$ and every two vertices $u,v \in C$, the distance between them in the induced graph $G(C)$ of $C$ (resp., in $G$) is at most $D$. Network decomposition is a powerful construct, very useful in distributed computing and beyond. It was shown by Awerbuch \etal \cite{AGLP89} and Panconesi and Srinivasan \cite{PS92}, that strong $(2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})},2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})})$ network decompositions can be computed in $2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})}$ distributed time. Linial and Saks \cite{LS93} devised an ingenious randomized algorithm that constructs {\em weak} $(O(\log n),O(\log n))$ network decompositions in $O(\log^2 n)$ time. It was however open till now if {\em strong} network decompositions with both parameters $2^{o(\sqrt{\log n})}$ can be constructed in distributed $2^{o(\sqrt{\log n})}$ time. In this paper we answer this long-standing open question in the affirmative, and show that strong $(O(\log n),O(\log n))$ network decompositions can be computed in $O(\log^2 n)$ time. We also present a tradeoff between parameters of our network decomposition. Our work is inspired by and relies on the "shifted shortest path approach", due to Blelloch \etal \cite{BGKMPT11}, and Miller \etal \cite{MPX13}. These authors developed this approach for PRAM algorithms for padded partitions. We adapt their approach to network decompositions in the distributed model of computation.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.