Paper detail

Distributed Software Evolution: a Survey

Distribution can be a feature of the software evolution process. In other words, temporally and spatially distributed teams and organizations can develop and work on a software application. The simplest case is to outsource production and employ workforce at distributed sites so that multiple distributed teams can work on a project within a parallel framework. If this distribution is global, it will be called the global software evolution or development. A higher level of distribution is defined as decentralization and decentralized software evolution, which means that software development can be independent of the initial provider. It also means that software execution is independent of the initial provider and the initial system so that the software application can easily be reused in different and new projects. However, the high level architecture is managed within a practically centralized framework in the decentralized software evolution. Most of the large scale open-source projects are exemplars of this level. In terms of distribution, there is a higher level of decentralized software evolution called "distributed cognition and leadership". At this level of distribution, all system levels evolve within a distributed framework, and there are no centralized points in the project network and its evolution process. Some open-source software applications are the exemplars of this last level. Not only is the distributed software evolution faced with certain challenges and opportunities to reach its goals, but it has also caused some challenges and opportunities in other fields. This paper conducts a general review of the distributed software evolution. For this purpose, the paper first addresses the importance of the distributed software evolution, and then introduces its noteworthy paradigms.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.