Paper detail

Distributed Differentially Private Ranking Aggregation

Ranking aggregation is commonly adopted in cooperative decision-making to assist in combining multiple rankings into a single representative. To protect the actual ranking of each individual, some privacy-preserving strategies, such as differential privacy, are often used. This, however, does not consider the scenario where the curator, who collects all rankings from individuals, is untrustworthy. This paper proposed a mechanism to solve the above situation using the distribute differential privacy framework. The proposed mechanism collects locally differential private rankings from individuals, then randomly permutes pairwise rankings using a shuffle model to further amplify the privacy protection. The final representative is produced by hierarchical rank aggregation. The mechanism was theoretically analysed and experimentally compared against existing methods, and demonstrated competitive results in both the output accuracy and privacy protection.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.