Paper detail

Distributed Control of Generation in a Transmission Grid with a High Penetration of Renewables

Deviations of grid frequency from the nominal frequency are an indicator of the global imbalance between genera- tion and load. Two types of control, a distributed propor- tional control and a centralized integral control, are cur- rently used to keep frequency deviations small. Although generation-load imbalance can be very localized, both controls primarily rely on frequency deviation as their in- put. The time scales of control require the outputs of the centralized integral control to be communicated to distant generators every few seconds. We reconsider this con- trol/communication architecture and suggest a hybrid ap- proach that utilizes parameterized feedback policies that can be implemented in a fully distributed manner because the inputs to these policies are local observables at each generator. Using an ensemble of forecasts of load and time-intermittent generation representative of possible fu- ture scenarios, we perform a centralized off-line stochas- tic optimization to select the generator-specific feedback parameters. These parameters need only be communi- cated to generators once per control period (60 minutes in our simulations). We show that inclusion of local power flows as feedback inputs is crucial and reduces frequency deviations by a factor of ten. We demonstrate our con- trol on a detailed transmission model of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Our findings suggest that a smart automatic and distributed control, relying on ad- vanced off-line and system-wide computations commu- nicated to controlled generators infrequently, may be a viable control and communication architecture solution. This architecture is suitable for a future situation when generation-load imbalances are expected to grow because of increased penetration of time-intermittent generation.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.