Paper detail

$μ$-Distortions or Running: A Guaranteed Discovery from CMB Spectrometry

We discuss the implications of a PIXIE-like experiment, which would measure $μ$-type spectral distortions of the CMB at a level of $σ_μ=(1/n)\times 10^{-8}$, with $n\geq1$ representing an improved sensitivity (e.g. $n=10$ corresponds to PRISM). Using Planck data and considering the six-parameter $Λ$CDM model, we compute the posterior for $μ_8\equivμ\times 10^{8}$ and find $μ_8=1.57^{+0.11}_{-0.13}$ ($68\%\,\mathrm{CL}$). This becomes $μ_{8} = 1.28^{+0.30}_{-0.52}$ ($68\%\,\mathrm{CL}$) when the running $α_\mathrm{s}$ of the spectral index is included. We point out that a sensitivity of about $3\times$ PIXIE implies a guaranteed discovery: $μ$-distortion is detected or $α_\mathrm{s}\geq 0$ is excluded (both at $95\%\,\mathrm{CL}$ or higher). This threshold sensitivity sets a clear benchmark for CMB spectrometry. For a combined analysis of PIXIE and current Planck data, we discuss the improvement on measurements of the tilt $n_\mathrm{s}$ and the running $α_\mathrm{s}$ and the dependence on the choice of the pivot. A fiducial running of $α_\mathrm{s}=-0.01$ (close to the Planck best-fit) leads to a detection of negative running at $2σ$ for $5\times$ PIXIE. A fiducial running of $α_\mathrm{s}=-0.02$, still compatible with Planck, requires $3\times$ PIXIE to rule out $α_\mathrm{s} = 0$ (at $95\%\,\mathrm{CL}$). We propose a convenient and compact visualization of the improving constraints on the tilt, running and tensor-to-scalar ratio.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.