Paper detail

Distortion of Magnetic Fields in a Starless Core VI: Application of Flux Freezing Model and Core Formation of FeSt 1-457

Observational data for the hourglass-like magnetic field toward the starless dense core FeSt 1-457 were compared with a flux freezing magnetic field model (Myers et al. 2018). Fitting of the observed plane-of-sky magnetic field using the flux freezing model gave a residual angle dispersion comparable with the results based on a simple three-dimensional parabolic model. The best-fit parameters for the flux freezing model were a line-of-sight magnetic inclination angle of $γ_{\rm mag} = 35^{\circ} \pm 15^{\circ}$ and a core center to ambient (background) density contrast of $ρ_{\rm c} / ρ_{\rm bkg} = 75$. The initial density for core formation ($ρ_0$) was estimated to be $ρ_{\rm c} / 75 = 4670$ cm$^{-3}$, which is about one order of magnitude higher than the expected density ($\sim 300$ cm$^{-3}$) for the inter-clump medium of the Pipe Nebula. FeSt 1-457 is likely to have been formed from the accumulation of relatively dense gas, and the relatively dense background column density of $A_V \simeq 5$ mag supports this scenario. The initial radius (core formation radius) $R_0$ and the initial magnetic field strength $B_0$ were obtained to be 0.15 pc ($1.64 R$) and $10.8-14.6$ $μ$G, respectively. We found that the initial density $ρ_0$ is consistent with the mean density of the nearly critical magnetized filament with magnetic field strength $B_0$ and radius $R_0$. The relatively dense initial condition for core formation can be naturally understood if the origin of the core is the fragmentation of magnetized filaments.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.