Paper detail

Distinguishing $W'$ Signals at Hadron Colliders Using Neural Networks

We investigate a neural network-based hypothesis test to distinguish different $W'$ and charged scalar resonances through the $\ell+\require{cancel}\cancel{E}_T$ channel at hadron colliders. This is traditionally challenging due to a four-fold ambiguity at proton-proton colliders, such as the Large Hadron Collider. Of the neural network approaches we studied, we find a multi-class classifier based on a fully-connected neural network trained upon 2D histograms made from kinematic variables of the final state $\ell$ to be the most powerful. Furthermore, by considering the 1-jet processes, we demonstrate that one can generalize to multiple $2D$ histograms to represent different variable pairs. Finally, as a comparison to traditional approaches, we compare our method with Bayesian hypothesis testing and discuss the pros and cons of each approach. The neural network scheme presented in this paper is a powerful tool that can help probe the properties of charged resonances.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.