Distinguishing perfect set properties in separable metrizable spaces

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

All spaces are assumed to be separable and metrizable. Our main result is that the statement "For every space XX, every closed subset of XX has the perfect set property if and only if every analytic subset of XX has the perfect set property" is equivalent to b>ω1\mathfrak{b}>ω_1 (hence, in particular, it is independent of ZFC\mathsf{ZFC}). This, together with a theorem of Solecki and an example of Miller, will allow us to determine the status of the statement "For every space XX, if every Γ\mathbfΓ subset of XX has the perfect set property then every Γ′\mathbfΓ' subset of XX has the perfect set property" as Γ,Γ′\mathbfΓ,\mathbfΓ' range over all pointclasses of complexity at most analytic or coanalytic. Along the way, we define and investigate a property of independent interest. We will say that a subset WW of 2ω2^ω has the Grinzing property if it is uncountable and for every uncountable Y⊆WY\subseteq W there exists an uncountable collection consisting of uncountable subsets of YY with pairwise disjoint closures in 2ω2^ω. The following theorems hold. (1) There exists a subset of 2ω2^ω with the Grinzing property. (2) Assume MA+¬CH\mathsf{MA}+\neg\mathsf{CH}. Then 2ω2^ω has the Grinzing property. (3) Assume CH\mathsf{CH}. Then 2ω2^ω does not have the Grinzing property. The first result was obtained by Miller using a theorem of Todorčević, and is needed in the proof of our main result.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.