Paper detail

Distinguishing `disks' from `mergers': tracing the kinematic asymmetries in local (U)LIRGs using `kinemetry'-based criteria

The kinematic characterization of different galaxy populations is a key observational input to distinguish between different galaxy evolutionary scenarios, since it helps to determine the number ratio of rotating disks to mergers at different cosmic epochs. Local (U)LIRGs offer a unique opportunity to study at high linear resolution and S/N extreme star forming events and compare them with those observed at high-z. We obtained Very Large Telescope (VLT) VIMOS optical integral field spectroscopy (IFS) data of a sample of 38 (U)LIRGs. The `unweighted' and `weighted' {kinemetry}-based methods are used to kinematically classify our galaxies in `disk' and `merger'. We simulate our systems at z=3 to evaluate how a loss of angular resolution affects our results. From the kinemetry-based analysis we are able classify our local (U)LIRGs in three distinct kinematic groups according to their total kinematic asymmetry values (K$_{tot}$) as derived when using the weighted (unweighted) method: 1) 25 out of 50 galaxies are kinematically classified as `disk', with a K$_{tot}\leq$ 0.16 (0.14); 2) 9 out of 50 galaxies are kinematically classified as `merger', with a K$_{tot}\geq$ 0.94 (0.66); 3) 16 out of 50 galaxies lie in the `transition region', in which disks and mergers coexist, with 0.16 (0.14) $<$ K$_{tot}$ $<$ 0.94 (0.66). When we apply our criteria to the high-z simulated systems, a lower total kinematic asymmetry frontier value (K$_{tot}$ $\sim$ 0.16 ($\sim$ 0.14)) is derived with respect to that found locally. The loss of angular resolution smears out the kinematic features, thus making objects to appear more kinematically regular than actually they are.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.