Paper detail

Distinguishing binary neutron star from neutron star-black hole mergers with gravitational waves

The gravitational-wave signal from the merger of two neutron stars cannot be easily differentiated from the signal produced by a comparable-mass mixed binary of a neutron star and a black hole. Indeed, both binary types can account for the gravitational-wave signal GW170817 even if its electromagnetic counterpart emission is taken into account. We propose a method that {requires neither information from the post-inspiral phase of the binary nor an electromagnetic counterpart} to identify mixed binaries of neutron stars merging with low-mass black holes using gravitational-waves alone. This method is based on the fact that certain neutron star properties that can be measured with gravitational-waves are common or similar for all neutron stars. For example all neutron stars share the same equation of state and if the latter is hadronic, neutron stars have similar radii. If a mixed binary is misidentified as a neutron star binary, the inferred neutron star properties will be misestimated and appear as outliers in a population of low-mass binaries. We show that as few as $\sim 5$ low-mass events will allow for the identification of the type of one event at the $80\%$ confidence level. We model the population of low-mass binaries with a hierarchical mixture model and show that we can constrain the existence of mixed binaries or measure their abundance relative to neutron star binaries to $\sim 0.1$ at the $68\%$ credible level with 100 events.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.