Paper detail

Distinguish three time-dependent dark energy models using statefinder pairs with error bars and Bayesian evidence

In this work, two completely different approaches, statefinder with error bars and Bayesian evidence, are used to distinguish and judge three time-dependent dark energy models. The parameters constrain for the three dark energy models are given using the current cosmic observational data sets : $Planck$ 2015, SNIa, BAO and OHD. Using the statefinder pairs with error bars, we find that the error region of the dark energy model, whose equation of state parameter is given by $w(a) = w_0+w_3\frac{1-a}{a^2+(1-a)^2}$, is relativity compact than the other two models during the all the evolving history. Meanwhile, the Bayesian evidence also provide that this model is significantly better than the other two models and the other two models are inconclusive. Then, there are reasons for believing that this model is a preferential candidate in dark energy investigation rather than the other two.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.