Paper detail

Distance Measurements from Supernovae and Dark Energy Constraints

Constraints on dark energy from current observational data are sensitive to how distances are measured from Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) data. We find that flux-averaging of SNe Ia can be used to test the presence of unknown systematic uncertainties, and yield more robust distance measurements from SNe Ia. We have applied this approach to the nearby + SDSS +ESSENCE +SNLS +HST set of 288 SNe Ia, and the ``Constitution''of set 397 SNe Ia. Combining the SN Ia data with CMB data from WMAP five year observations, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, the data of 69 gammay-ray bursts, and the Hubble constant measurement from the HST project SHOES, we measure the dark energy density function X(z)=ρ_X(z)/ρ_X(0) as a free function of redshift (assumed to be a constant at z>1 or z>1.5). Without flux-averaging of SNe Ia, the combined data using the ``Constitution'' set of SNe Ia seem to indicate a deviation from a cosmological constant at ~95% confidence level at 0< z <0.8; they are consistent with a cosmological constant at ~68% confidence level when SNe Ia are flux-averaged. The combined data using the nearby +SDSS +ESSENCE +SNLS +HST data set of SNe Ia are consistent with a cosmological constant at 68% confidence level with or without flux-averaging of SNe Ia, and give dark energy constraints that are significantly more stringent than that using the ``Constitution'' set of SNe Ia. Assuming a flat universe, dark energy is detected at >98% confidence level for z<= 0.75 using the combined data with 288 SNe Ia from nearby + SDSS+ ESSENCE +SNLS +HST, independent of the assumptions about X(z>1). We quantify dark energy constraints without assuming a flat universe using the dark energy Figure-of-Merit (FoM) for both $X(z)$ and a dark energy equation-of-state linear in the cosmic scale factor.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.