Paper detail

Distance-Independent Entanglement Generation in a Quantum Network using Space-Time Multiplexed Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) Measurements

In a quantum network that successfully creates links, shared Bell states between neighboring repeater nodes, with probability $p$ in each time slot, and performs Bell State Measurements at nodes with success probability $q<1$, the end to end entanglement generation rate drops exponentially with the distance between consumers, despite multi-path routing. If repeaters can perform multi-qubit projective measurements in the GHZ basis that succeed with probability $q$, the rate does not change with distance in a certain $(p,q)$ region, but decays exponentially outside. This region where the distance independent rate occurs is the supercritical region of a new percolation problem. We extend this GHZ protocol to incorporate a time-multiplexing blocklength $k$, the number of time slots over which a repeater can mix-and-match successful links to perform fusion on. As $k$ increases, the supercritical region expands. For a given $(p,q)$, the entanglement rate initially increases with $k$, and once inside the supercritical region for a high enough $k$, it decays as $1/k$ GHZ states per time slot. When memory coherence time exponentially distributed with mean $μ$ is incorporated, it is seen that increasing $k$ does not indefinitely increase the supercritical region; it has a hard $μ$ dependent limit. Finally, we find that incorporating space-division multiplexing, i.e., running the above protocol independently in up to $d$ disconnected network regions, where $d$ is the network&#39;s node degree, one can go beyond the 1 GHZ state per time slot rate that the above randomized local link-state protocol cannot surpass. As $(p,q)$ increases, one can approach the ultimate min-cut entanglement generation capacity of $d$ GHZ states per slot.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.