Paper detail

Distance determination to 12 Type II-P Supernovae using the Expanding Photosphere Method

We use early-time photometry and spectroscopy of 12 Type II plateau supernovae (SNe IIP) to derive their distances using the expanding photosphere method (EPM). We perform this study using two sets of Type II supernova (SN II) atmosphere models, three filter subsets ($\{BV\}$, $\{BVI\}$, $\{VI\}$), and two methods for the host-galaxy extinction, which leads to 12 Hubble diagrams. We find that systematic differences in the atmosphere models lead to $\sim $50% differences in the EPM distances and to a value of ${\rm H_0}$ between 52 and 101 ${\rm km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$. Using the $\{VI\}$ filter subset we obtain the lowest dispersion in the Hubble diagram, {${\rm σ_μ = 0.32}$ mag}. We also apply the EPM analysis to the well-observed SN IIP 1999em. With the $\{VI\}$ filter subset we derive a distance ranging from 9.3 $\pm$ 0.5 Mpc to 13.9 $\pm$ 1.4 Mpc depending on the atmosphere model employed.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.