Paper detail

Distance between cubics and rationals

We investigate the following problem: what is the smallest possible distance between a cubic irrational $ξ$ and a rational number $p/q$ in terms of the height $H(ξ)$ and $q$? More precisely, we consider the set $D_{3,1}$ consisting of all pairs $(u,v)$ of positive real numbers such that $|ξ- p/q| > cH^{-u}(ξ)q^{-v}$ for all cubic irrationals $ξ$ and rationals $p/q$. First, we transform this problem into one about the root separation of cubic polynomials. Second, under the assumption of the famous abc-conjecture, we give an almost complete description of $D_{3,1}$. Namely, the points $(u,v)$ with $2\le v\le 3$ that lie in the interior of $D_{3,1}$ are characterised by the inequality $u> 10-3v$. Assuming only the weaker Hall conjecture, we also obtain nontrivial results about the shape of $D_{3,1}$, although these are not as strong as those derived from the abc-conjecture. Finally, we discuss an analogue of the set $D_{3,1}$ in function fields where we are able to give an almost complete description unconditionally.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.