Paper detail

Dissipative Unified Dark Fluid: Observational Constraints

We adopt a standard FRW cosmology with a unified scenario, where the usual dark matter and dark energy sectors are replaced by a single dissipative unified dark fluid (DUDF). The equation of state of such fluid can asymptote between two power laws. As a result, it enables fluid to have a smooth transition from dust at early times to dark energy at late times. The dissipation is represented by a bulk viscosity with a constant coefficient, whereas shear viscosity is excluded due to the isotropy of the universe. We performed a likelihood analysis using recent observational datasets from local $H_0$ measurements, SNe Ia, observational Hubble data, BAO, and CMB to put cosmological constraints on the model. The special case of the non-dissipative unified dark fluid (UDF) is also studied, while a similar analysis is performed on the $Λ$CDM model for comparison. We got an $H_0$ value of $70.02$ $km$ $s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}$ for DUDF and $70.25$ $km$ $s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}$ for the UDF model. Our analyses revealed that the DUDF model has the lower $χ_{\rm min}^2$-value. Based on model selection statistics in the form of the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), we compare different models to select the favored one due to the observational data used. Our results revealed that the UDF model has the minimum AIC, with the conclusion that it is the most favorable model for the data. $ΔAIC$ value of other models are then measured to this model. This difference indicated that the DUDF model is a substantial model on the level of empirical support. Examining the evolution of the deceleration parameter, the effective equation of state parameter, and the density parameter indicated that our unified fluid doesn't deviate from the standard $Λ$CDM model at early times, with the ability to play the role of the cosmological constant by accelerating the universe at the late times.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.