Paper detail

Dissecting the role of initial collision geometry for jet quenching observables in relativistic heavy ion collisions

The observation of large azimuthal anisotropy or $v_2$ for hadrons above $p_T>5$ GeV/$c$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm nn}}=200$ GeV has been a longstanding challenge for jet quenching models based on perturbative QCD (pQCD). Using a simple jet absorption model, we seek to clarify the situation by exploring in detail how the calculated $v_2$ varies with choices of the collision geometry as well as choices of the path length dependence and thermalization time $τ_0$ in the energy loss formula. Besides the change of eccentricity due to distortion from gluon saturation or event-by-event fluctuation, we find that the $v_2$ is also sensitive to the centrality dependence of multiplicity and the relative size between the matter profile and the jet profile. We find that the $v_2$ calculated for the naive quadratic path length dependence of energy loss, even including eccentricity fluctuation and the gluon saturation, is not enough to describe the experimental data at high $p_T$ ($\sim$ 6 GeV/$c$) in Au+Au collisions. However, it can match the full centrality dependence of $v_2$ data if higher power path length dependence of energy loss is allowed. We also find that the calculated $v_2$ is sensitive to the assumption of the early time dynamics but generally increases with $τ_0$, opposite to what one expects for elliptic flow. This study attests to the importance of confining the initial geometry, possibly by combining jet quenching $v_2$ with elliptic flow and other jet quenching observables, for proper interpretation of the experimental data.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.