Paper detail

Dissecting the Extended X-ray Emission in the Merging Pair NGC 6240

We present a detailed spectral and imaging analysis of the central $15''$ radius ($\sim 7.5 \text{ kpc}$) region of the merger galaxy NGC 6240 that makes use of all the available \textit{Chandra}-ACIS data ($0.3 - 3 \text{ keV}$ effective exposure of $\sim 190 \text{ ks}$). This region shows extended X-ray structures with lower energy counterparts imaged in CO, [O III] and H$α$ line emission. We find both photo-ionized phases of possible nuclear excitation and thermal shock-excited emission in the different large-scale components: the north-west "loop" detected in H$α$, the region surrounding the two nuclei, the large outflow region to the north-east detected in [O III], and the southern X-ray extensions. The latter could be the ionization cone of the northern nucleus, with the N counterpart being obscured by the galaxy disk. The radial distribution of the X-ray surface brightness suggests a confined hot interstellar medium at $r < 2.5 \text{ kpc}$, with a free-flowing wind at larger radii; if the confinement is magnetic, we estimate B-field values of $\sim 100\,μ\text{G}$ , similar to those measured in the halo of M82. The thermal gas of the extended halo at $kT \sim 1 \text{ keV}$ absorbs soft X-rays from the AGN, but not the extreme ultraviolet radiation leading to a rapid increase in $F_{\text{[O III]}}/F_{\text{X}}$ beyond $\sim 3 \text{ kpc}$. The $α$ element to Fe abundance ratios of the thermal components in the different regions of the extended X-ray emission are generally compatible with SNe II yields, confirming the importance of the active star formation in NGC 6240.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.