Paper detail

Dissecting the collinear structure of quark splitting at NNLL

We explore the collinear limit of final-state quark splittings at order $α_s^2$. While at general NLL level, this limit is described simply by a product of leading-order $1\to 2$ DGLAP splitting functions, at the NNLL level we need to consider $1\to3$ splitting functions. Here, by performing suitable integrals of the triple-collinear splitting functions, we demonstrate how one may extract $\mathcal{B}^q_2(z)$, a differential version of the coefficient $B^q_2$ that enters the quark form factor at NNLL and governs the intensity of collinear radiation from a quark. The variable $z$ corresponds to the quark energy fraction after an initial $1 \to 2$ splitting, and our results yield effective higher-order splitting functions, which may be considered as a step towards the construction of NNLL parton showers. Further, while in the limit $z \to 1$ we recover the standard soft limit results involving the CMW coupling with scale $k_t$, the $z$ dependence we obtain also motivates the extension of the notion of a physical coupling beyond the soft limit.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.