Paper detail

Disruption of Star Clusters in the Interacting Antennae Galaxies

We reexamine the age distribution of star clusters in the Antennae in the context of N-body+hydrodynamical simulations of these interacting galaxies. All of the simulations that account for the observed morphology and other properties of the Antennae have star formation rates that vary relatively slowly with time, by factors of only 1.3 - 2.5 in the past 10^8 yr. In contrast, the observed age distribution of the clusters declines approximately as a power law, dN/dt \propto t^{gamma} with gamma = -1.0, for ages 10^6 yr \la t \la 10^9 yr. These two facts can only be reconciled if the clusters are disrupted progressively for at least 10^8 yr and possibly 10^9 yr. When we combine the simulated formation rates with a power-law model, f_surv \propto t^{delta}, for the fraction of clusters that survive to each age t, we match the observed age distribution with exponents in the range -0.9 \la delta \la -0.6 (with a slightly different delta for each simulation). The similarity between delta and gamma indicates that dN/dt is shaped mainly by the disruption of clusters rather than variations in their formation rate. Thus, the situation in the interacting Antennae resembles that in relatively quiescent galaxies such as the Milky Way and the Magellanic Clouds.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.