Paper detail

Displacement cascades and defects annealing in tungsten, Part II: Object kinetic Monte Carlo Simulation of Tungsten Cascade Aging

We describe the results of object kinetic Monte Carlo (OKMC) simulations of the annealing of primary cascade damage in bulk tungsten using a comprehensive database of cascades obtained from molecular dynamics [1] as a function of primary knock-on atom (PKA) energy and direction, and temperatures of 300, 1025 and 2050 K. An increase in SIA clustering but decrease in vacancy clustering with temperature combined with disparate mobilities of SIAs versus vacancies causes an interesting temperature effect on cascade annealing, which is quite different from what one would expect. The annealing efficiency (ratio of number of defects after and before annealing) exhibits an inverse U-shape curve as a function of temperature. In addition, we will also describe the capabilities of our newly developed OKMC code; KSOME (kinetic simulations of microstructure evolution) used to carryout these simulations

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.