Paper detail

Displacement and annihilation of Dirac gap-nodes in d-wave iron-based superconductors

Several experimental and theoretical arguments have been made in favor of a $d-$wave symmetry for the superconducting state in some Fe-based materials. It is a common belief that a $d-$wave gap in the Fe-based superconductors must have nodes on the Fermi surfaces centered at the $Γ$ point of the Brillouin zone. Here we show that, while this is the case for a single Fermi surface made out of a single orbital, the situation is more complex if there is an even number of Fermi surfaces made out of different orbitals. In particular, we show that for the two $Γ$-centered hole Fermi surfaces made out of $d_{xz}$ and $d_{yz}$ orbitals, the nodal points still exist near $T_{c}$ along the symmetry-imposed directions, but are are displaced to momenta between the two Fermi surfaces. If the two hole pockets are close enough, pairs of nodal points can merge and annihilate at some $T<T_{c}$, making the $d-$wave state completely nodeless. These results imply that photoemission evidence for a nodeless gap on the $d_{xz}/d_{yz}$ Fermi surfaces of KFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ does not rule out $d-$wave gap symmetry in this material, while a nodeless gap observed on the $d_{xy}$ pocket in K$_{x}$Fe$_{2-y}$Se$_{2}$ is truly inconsistent with the $d-$wave gap symmetry.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.