Paper detail

Disorder relevance for the random walk pinning model in dimension 3

We study the continuous time version of the random walk pinning model, where conditioned on a continuous time random walk Y on Z^d with jump rate ρ>0, which plays the role of disorder, the law up to time t of a second independent random walk X with jump rate 1 is Gibbs transformed with weight e^{βL_t(X,Y)}, where L_t(X,Y) is the collision local time between X and Y up to time t. As the inverse temperature βvaries, the model undergoes a localization-delocalization transition at some critical β_c>=0. A natural question is whether or not there is disorder relevance, namely whether or not β_c differs from the critical point β_c^{ann} for the annealed model. In Birkner and Sun [BS09], it was shown that there is disorder irrelevance in dimensions d=1 and 2, and disorder relevance in d>=4. For d>=5, disorder relevance was first proved by Birkner, Greven and den Hollander [BGdH08]. In this paper, we prove that if X and Y have the same jump probability kernel, which is irreducible and symmetric with finite second moments, then there is also disorder relevance in the critical dimension d=3, and β_c-β^{ann}_c is at least of the order e^{-C(ζ)ρ^{-ζ}}, C(ζ)>0, for any ζ>2. Our proof employs coarse graining and fractional moment techniques, which have recently been applied by Lacoin [L09] to the directed polymer model in random environment, and by Giacomin, Lacoin and Toninelli [GLT09] to establish disorder relevance for the random pinning model in the critical dimension. Along the way, we also prove a continuous time version of Doney's local limit theorem [D97] for renewal processes with infinite mean.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.