Paper detail

Disk fragmentation and the formation of population III stars

Our understanding of population III star formation is still in its infancy. They are formed in dark matter minihalos of $\rm 10^5-10^6 M_{\odot}$ at $z=20-30$. Recent high resolution cosmological simulations show that a protostellar disk forms as a consequence of gravitational collapse and fragments into multiple clumps. However, it is not entirely clear if these clumps will be able to survive to form multiple stars as simulations are unable to follow the disk evolution for longer times. In this study, we employ a simple analytical model to derive the properties of marginally stable steady-state disks. Our results show that the stability of the disk depends on the critical value of the viscous parameter $α$. For $α_{crit} = 1$, the disk is stable for an accretion rate of $\rm \leq 10^{-3} M_{\odot}/yr$ and becomes unstable at radii about $\rm \geq 100 AU$ in the presence of an accretion rate of $\rm 10^{-2} M_{\odot}/yr$. For $0.06 < α_{crit} < 1$, the disk can be unstable for both accretion rates. The comparison of the migration and the Kelvin-Helmholtz time scales shows that clumps are expected to migrate inward before reaching the main sequence. Furthermore, in the presence of a massive central star the clumps within the central 1 AU will be tidally disrupted. We also find that UV feedback from the central star is unable to disrupt the disk, and that photo-evaporation becomes important only once the accretion rate has dropped to $\rm 2 \times 10^{-4} M_{\odot}/yr$. As a result, the central star may reach a mass of 100 $\rm M_{\odot}$ or even higher.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.