Paper detail

Disjoining Pressure Driven Transpiration of Water in a Simulated Tree

We present an investigation of transpiration of water in a 100 m tall tree using continuum simulations. Disjoining pressure is found to induce absolute negative pressures as high as -23.5 atm at the liquid-vapor meniscus during evaporation, thus presenting a sufficient stand-alone explanation of the transpiration mechanism. In this work, we begin by first developing an expression of disjoining pressure in a water film as a function of distance from the surface from prior experimental findings. The expression is then implemented in a commercial computational fluid dynamics solver and the disjoining pressure effect on water wicking in nanochannels of height varying from 59 nm to 1 micron is simulated. The simulation results are in excellent agreement with experimental data, thus demonstrating and validating that near-surface molecular interactions can be integrated in continuum numerical simulations through the disjoining pressure term. Following the implementation, we simulate the transpiration process of passive water transport over a height of 100 m by using a domain comprising of nanopore connected to a tube with a ground-based water tank, thus mimicking the stomata-xylem-soil pathway in trees. By varying the evaporation rate from liquid-vapor interface in the nanopore, effects on naturally-created pressure difference and liquid flow velocity are estimated. Further, kinetic theory analysis is performed to study the combined effect of absolute negative liquid-film pressure and accommodation coefficient on the maximum mass flux feasible during transpiration. Continuum simulations coupled with kinetic theory reiterate the existence of an upper limit to height of trees. The numerical model developed here is adept to be employed to design and advance several other nanofluidics-based natural and engineering systems.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.