Paper detail

Disentangling redshift-space distortions and nonlinear bias using the 2D power spectrum

We present the nonlinear 2D galaxy power spectrum, $P(k,μ)$, in redshift space, measured from the Dark Sky simulations, using galaxy catalogs constructed with both halo occupation distribution and subhalo abundance matching methods, chosen to represent an intermediate redshift sample of luminous red galaxies. We find that the information content in individual $μ$ (cosine of the angle to the line of sight) bins is substantially richer then multipole moments, and show that this can be used to isolate the impact of nonlinear growth and redshift space distortion (RSD) effects. Using the $μ<0.2$ simulation data, which we show is not impacted by RSD effects, we can successfully measure the nonlinear bias to an accuracy of $\sim 5$% at $k<0.6 h$Mpc$^{-1}$. This use of individual $μ$ bins to extract the nonlinear bias successfully removes a large parameter degeneracy when constraining the linear growth rate of structure. We carry out a joint parameter estimation, using the low $μ$ simulation data to constrain the nonlinear bias, and $μ\ge0.2$ to constrain the growth rate and show that $f$ can be constrained to $\sim 26\, (22)$% to a $k_{\rm max}< 0.4\, (0.6) h$Mpc$^{-1}$ from clustering alone using a simple dispersion model, for a range of galaxy models. Our analysis of individual $μ$ bins also reveals interesting physical effects which arise simply from different methods of populating halos with galaxies. We find a prominent turnaround scale, at which RSD damping effects are greater then the nonlinear growth, which differs not only for each $μ$ bin but also for each galaxy model. These features may provide unique signatures which could be used to shed light on the galaxy-dark matter connection.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.