Paper detail

Discs and outflows in the early phases of massive star formation: influence of magnetic fields and ambipolar diffusion

We study mass accretion and ejection in the vicinity of massive star forming cores using high-resolution (5 au) 3D AMR numerical simulations. We investigate the mechanisms at the origin of outflows and characterise the properties of the disc forming around massive protostars. We include both protostellar radiative feedback via PMS evolutionary tracks and magnetic ambipolar diffusion. We studied 3 different cases: purely hydrodynamical, ideal MHD, and ambipolar diffusion. In the resistive models, we investigate the effects the initial amplitude of both magnetic field and rotation have on the properties of the massive protostellar system. We use simple criteria to identify the outflow and disc material and follow their evolution as the central star accretes mass up to 20 solar mass. The outflow is completely different when magnetic fields are introduced, so that magnetic processes are the main driver of the outflow up to stellar masses of ~20 solar mass. The disc properties depend on the physics included. The disc formed in the ideal and resistive runs show opposite properties in terms of plasma beta and of magnetic fields topology. While the disc in the ideal case is dominated by the magnetic pressure and the toroidal magnetic fields, the one formed in the resistive runs is dominated by the thermal pressure and has essentially vertical magnetic fields in the inner regions (R<200 au). We find that magnetic processes dominate the early evolution of massive protostellar systems (<20 solar mass) and shapes the accretion/ejection as well as the disc formation. Ambipolar diffusion is mainly at work at disc scales and regulates its properties. Our finding for the outflow and disc properties are reminiscent of low-mass star formation, suggesting that accretion and ejection in young massive and low-mass protostars are regulated by the same physical processes at the early stages.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.