Paper detail

Discrimination of Membrane Antigen Affinity by B cells Requires Dominance of Kinetic Proofreading over Serial Triggering

B cells receptor (BCR) signaling in response to membrane-bound antigen increases with antigen affinity, a process known as affinity discrimination. We use computational modeling to show that B cell affinity discrimination requires that kinetic proofreading predominate over serial engagement. We find that if BCR molecules become signaling-capable immediately upon binding antigen, the loss in serial engagement as affinity increases results in weaker signaling with increasing affinity. A threshold time for antigen to stay bound to BCR for several seconds before the latter becomes signaling-capable, similar to kinetic proofreading, is needed to overcome the loss in serial engagement due to increasing antigen affinity, and replicate the monotonic increase in B cell signaling with affinity observed in B cell activation experiments. This finding matches well with the experimentally observed time (~ 20 seconds) required for the BCR signaling domains to undergo antigen and lipid raft-mediated conformational changes that lead to Src-family kinase recruitment. We hypothesize that the physical basis of the threshold time of antigen binding may lie in the formation timescale of BCR dimers. The latter decreases with increasing affinity, resulting in shorter threshold antigen binding times as affinity increases. Such an affinity-dependent kinetic proofreading requirement results in affinity discrimination very similar to that observed in biological experiments. B cell affinity discrimination is critical to the process of affinity maturation and the production of high affinity antibodies, and thus our results here have important implications in applications such as vaccine design.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.