Paper detail

Discriminating Strange Star Mergers from Neutron Star Mergers by Gravitational-Wave Measurements

We perform three-dimensional relativistic hydrodynamical simulations of the coalescence of strange stars (SSs) and explore the possibility to decide on the strange matter hypothesis by means of gravitational-wave (GW) measurements. Selfbinding of strange quark matter (SQM) and the generally more compact stars yield features that clearly distinguish SS from neutron star (NS) mergers, e.g. hampering tidal disruption during the plunge of quark stars. Furthermore, instead of forming dilute halos around the remnant as in the case of NS mergers, the coalescence of SSs results in a differentially rotating hypermassive object with a sharp surface layer surrounded by a geometrically thin, clumpy high-density SQM disk. We also investigate the importance of including non-zero temperature equations of state (EoSs) in NS and SS merger simulations. In both cases we find a crucial sensitivity of the dynamics and outcome of the coalescence to thermal effects, which, e.g., determine the outer remnant structure and the delay time of the dense remnant core to black hole collapse. For comparing and classifying the GW signals, we use a number of characteristic quantities like the maximum frequency during inspiral or the dominant frequency of oscillations of the postmerger remnant. In general, these frequencies are higher for SS mergers. If not, additional features of the GW luminosity spectrum may help to discriminate coalescence events of the different types. Future GW measurements may thus help to decide on the existence of SQM stars. (abridged)

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.