Paper detail

Discretizing quantum field theories for quantum simulation

To date, all proposed quantum algorithms for simulating quantum field theory (QFT) simulate (continuous-time) Hamiltonian lattice QFT as a stepping stone. Two overlooked issues are how large we can take the timestep in these simulations while getting the right physics and whether we can go beyond the standard recipe that relies on Hamiltonian lattice QFT. The first issue is crucial in practice for, e.g., trapped-ion experiments which actually have a lower bound on the possible ratio of timestep to lattice spacing. To this end, we show that a timestep equal to or going to zero faster than the spatial lattice spacing is necessary for quantum simulations of QFT, but far more importantly a timestep equal to the lattice spacing is actually sufficient. To do this, first for $ϕ^4$ theory, we give a quantum circuit exactly equivalent to the real-time path integral from the discrete-time Lagrangian formulation of lattice QFT. Next we give another circuit with no lattice QFT analogue, but, by using Feynman rules applied to the circuit, we see that it also reproduces the correct continuum behaviour. Finally, we look at non-abelian gauge fields, showing that the discrete-time lattice QFT path-integral is exactly equivalent to a finite-depth local circuit. All of these circuits have an analogue of a lightcone on the lattice and therefore are examples of quantum cellular automata. Aside from the potential practical benefit of these circuits, this all suggests that the path-integral approach to lattice QFT need not be overlooked in quantum simulations of physics and has a simple quantum information interpretation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.