Paper detail

Discretized Approaches to Schematization

To produce cartographic maps, simplification is typically used to reduce complexity of the map to a legible level. With schematic maps, however, this simplification is pushed far beyond the legibility threshold and is instead constrained by functional need and resemblance. Moreover, stylistic geometry is often used to convey the schematic nature of the map. In this paper we explore discretized approaches to computing a schematic shape $S$ for a simple polygon $P$. We do so by overlaying a plane graph $G$ on $P$ as the solution space for the schematic shape. Topological constraints imply that $S$ should describe a simple polygon. We investigate two approaches, simple map matching and connected face selection, based on commonly used similarity metrics. With the former, $S$ is a simple cycle $C$ in $G$ and we quantify resemblance via the Fréchet distance. We prove that it is NP-hard to compute a cycle that approximates the minimal Fréchet distance over all simple cycles in a plane graph $G$. This result holds even if $G$ is a partial grid graph, if area preservation is required and if we assume a given sequence of turns is specified. With the latter, $S$ is a connected face set in $G$, quantifying resemblance via the symmetric difference. Though the symmetric difference seems a less strict measure, we prove that it is NP-hard to compute the optimal face set. This result holds even if $G$ is full grid graph or a triangular or hexagonal tiling, and if area preservation is required. Moreover, it is independent of whether we allow the set of faces to have holes or not.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.