Paper detail

Discrete Distribution Estimation with Local Differential Privacy: A Comparative Analysis

Local differential privacy is a promising privacy-preserving model for statistical aggregation of user data that prevents user privacy leakage from the data aggregator. This paper focuses on the problem of estimating the distribution of discrete user values with Local differential privacy. We review and present a comparative analysis on the performance of the existing discrete distribution estimation algorithms in terms of their accuracy on benchmark datasets. Our evaluation benchmarks include real-world and synthetic datasets of categorical individual values with the number of individuals from hundreds to millions and the domain size up to a few hundreds of values. The experimental results show that the Basic RAPPOR algorithm generally performs best for the benchmark datasets in the high privacy regime while the k-RR algorithm often gives the best estimation in the low privacy regime. In the medium privacy regime, the performance of the k-RR, the k-subset, and the HR algorithms are fairly competitive with each other and generally better than the performance of the Basic RAPPOR and the CMS algorithms.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.