Paper detail

Discrete Decreasing Minimization, Part II: Views from Discrete Convex Analysis

We continue to consider the discrete decreasing minimization problem on an integral base-polyhedron treated in Part I. The problem is to find a lexicographically minimal integral vector in an integral base-polyhedron, where the components of a vector are arranged in a decreasing order. This study can be regarded as a discrete counter-part of the work by Fujishige (1980) on the lexicographically optimal base and the principal partition of a base-polyhedron in continuous variables. The objective of Part II is two-fold. The first is to offer structural views from discrete convex analysis (DCA) on the results of Part I obtained by the constructive and algorithmic approach. The second objective is to pave the way of DCA approach to discrete decreasing minimization on other discrete structures such as the intersection of M-convex sets, flows, and submodular flows. We derive the structural results in Part I from fundamental facts on M-convex sets and M-convex functions in DCA. A direct characterization is given to the canonical partition, which was constructed by an iterative procedure in Part I. This reveals the precise relationship between the canonical partition for the discrete case and the principal partition for the continuous case. Moreover, this result entails a proximity theorem, stating that every decreasingly minimal element is contained in the small box containing the (unique) fractional decreasingly minimal element (the minimum-norm point), leading further to a continuous relaxation algorithm for finding a decreasingly minimal element of an M-convex set. Thus the relationship between the continuous and discrete cases is completely clarified. Furthermore, we present DCA min-max formulas for network flows, the intersection of two M-convex sets, and submodular flows.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.