Paper detail

Discovery of ubiquitous lithium production in low-mass stars

The vast majority of stars with mass similar to the Sun are expected to only destroy lithium over the course of their lives, via low-temperature nuclear burning. This has now been supported by observations of hundreds of thousands of red giant stars (Brown et al. 1989, Kumar et al. 2011, Deepak et al. 2019, Singh et al. 2019, Casey et al. 2019). Here we perform the first large-scale systematic investigation into the Li content of stars in the red clump phase of evolution, which directly follows the red giant branch phase. Surprisingly we find that all red clump stars have high levels of lithium for their evolutionary stage. On average the lithium content increases by a factor of 40 after the end of the red giant branch stage. This suggests that all low-mass stars undergo a lithium production phase between the tip of the red giant branch and the red clump. We demonstrate that our finding is not predicted by stellar theory, revealing a stark tension between observations and models. We also show that the heavily studied (Brown et al. 1989, Reddy et al. 2005, Kumar et al. 2011, Singh et al. 2019, Casey et al. 2019) very Li-rich giants, with A(Li) $> +1.5$ dex, represent only the extreme tail of the lithium enhancement distribution, comprising 3% of red clump stars. Our findings suggest a new definition limit for Li-richness in red clump stars, A(Li) $> -0.9$ dex, which is much lower than the limit of A(Li) $> +1.5$ dex used over many decades (Brown et al. 1989, Castilho et al. 1995, Reddy et al. 2005, Carlberg et al. 2016, Casey et al. 2019, Holanda et al. 2020).

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.