Paper detail

Discovery of TeV gamma-ray emission from the pulsar wind nebula 3C 58 by MAGIC

The pulsar wind nebula (PWN) 3C 58 is one of the historical very-high-energy (VHE; E>100 GeV) gamma-ray source candidates. It is energized by one of the highest spin-down power pulsars known (5% of Crab pulsar) and it has been compared to the Crab Nebula due to their morphological similarities. This object was previously observed by imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes (Whipple, VERITAS and MAGIC), although not detected, with an upper limit of 2.4% Crab Unit (C.U.) at VHE. It was detected by Fermi-LAT with a spectrum extending beyond 100 GeV. We analyzed 81 hours of 3C 58 data taken with the MAGIC telescopes and we detected VHE gamma-ray emission with a significance of 5.7 sigma and an integral flux of 0.65% C.U. above 1 TeV. The differential energy spectrum between 400 GeV and 10 TeV is well described by a power-law function dϕ/dE=f_0(E/1TeV)^{-Gamma} with f_0=(2.0\pm0.4_{stat}\pm0.6_{sys})\times10^{-13}cm^{-2}s^{-1}TeV^{-1} and Gamma=2.4\pm0.2_{stat}\pm0.2_{sys}. The skymap is compatible with an unresolved source. We report the first significant detection of PWN 3C 58 at TeV energies. According to our results 3C 58 is the least luminous VHE gamma-ray PWN ever detected at VHE and the one with the lowest flux at VHE to date. We compare our results with the expectations of time-dependent models in which electrons up-scatter photon fields. The best representation favors a distance to the PWN of 2 kpc and Far Infrared (FIR) comparable to CMB photon fields. If we consider an unexpectedly high FIR density, the data can also be reproduced by models assuming a 3.2 kpc distance. A low magnetic field, far from equipartition, is required to explain the VHE data. Hadronic contribution from the hosting supernova remnant (SNR) requires unrealistic energy budget given the density of the medium, disfavoring cosmic ray acceleration in the SNR as origin of the VHE gamma-ray emission.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
MAGIC CollaborationJ. AleksićS. AnsoldiL. A. AntonelliP. AntoranzA. BabicP. BangaleJ. A. BarrioJ. Becerra GonzálezW. BednarekE. BernardiniB. BiasuzziA. BilandO. BlanchS. BonnefoyG. BonnoliF. BorracciT. BretzE. CarmonaA. CarosiP. ColinE. ColomboJ. L. ContrerasJ. CortinaS. CovinoP. Da VelaF. DazziA. De AngelisG. De CanevaB. De LottoE. de Oña WilhelmiC. Delgado MendezD. Dominis PresterD. DornerM. DoroS. EineckeD. EisenacherD. ElsaesserM. V. FonsecaL. FontK. FrantzenC. FruckD. GalindoR. J. García LópezM. GarczarczykD. Garrido TerratsM. GaugN. GodinovićA. González MuñozS. R. GozziniD. HadaschY. HanabataM. HayashidaJ. HerreraD. HildebrandJ. HoseD. HrupecW. IdecV. KadeniusH. KellermannK. KodaniY. KonnoJ. KrauseH. KuboJ. KushidaA. La BarberaD. LelasN. LewandowskaE. LindforsS. LombardiM. LópezR. López-CotoA. López-OramasE. LorenzI. LozanoM. MakarievK. MallotG. ManevaN. MankuzhiyilK. MannheimL. MaraschiB. MarcoteM. MariottiM. MartínezD. MazinU. MenzelJ. M. MirandaR. MirzoyanA. MoralejoP. Munar-AdroverD. NakajimaA. NiedzwieckiK. NilssonK. NishijimaK. NodaR. OritoA. OverkempingS. PaianoM. PalatielloD. PanequeR. PaolettiJ. M. ParedesX. Paredes-FortunyM. PersicP. G. Prada MoroniE. PrandiniI. PuljakR. ReinthalW. RhodeM. RibóJ. RicoJ. Rodriguez GarciaS. RügamerT. SaitoK. SaitoK. SataleckaV. ScalzottoV. ScapinC. SchultzT. SchweizerS. N. ShoreA. SillanpääJ. SitarekI. SnidaricD. SobczynskaF. SpanierV. StamatescuA. StamerraT. SteinbringJ. StorzM. StrzysL. TakaloH. TakamiF. TavecchioP. TemnikovT. TerzićD. TescaroM. TeshimaJ. ThaeleO. TibollaD. F. TorresT. ToyamaA. TrevesM. UellenbeckP. VoglerR. ZaninJ. MartinM. A. Pérez-Torres

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access148 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

MAGIC CollaborationJ. AleksićS. AnsoldiL. A. AntonelliP. AntoranzA. BabicP. BangaleJ. A. BarrioJ. Becerra GonzálezW. BednarekE. BernardiniB. BiasuzziA. BilandO. BlanchS. BonnefoyG. BonnoliF. BorracciT. BretzE. CarmonaA. CarosiP. ColinE. ColomboJ. L. ContrerasJ. CortinaS. CovinoP. Da VelaF. DazziA. De AngelisG. De CanevaB. De LottoE. de Oña WilhelmiC. Delgado MendezD. Dominis PresterD. DornerM. DoroS. EineckeD. EisenacherD. ElsaesserM. V. FonsecaL. FontK. FrantzenC. FruckD. GalindoR. J. García LópezM. GarczarczykD. Garrido TerratsM. GaugN. GodinovićA. González MuñozS. R. GozziniD. HadaschY. HanabataM. HayashidaJ. HerreraD. HildebrandJ. HoseD. HrupecW. IdecV. KadeniusH. KellermannK. KodaniY. KonnoJ. KrauseH. KuboJ. KushidaA. La BarberaD. LelasN. LewandowskaE. LindforsS. LombardiM. LópezR. López-CotoA. López-OramasE. LorenzI. LozanoM. MakarievK. MallotG. ManevaN. MankuzhiyilK. MannheimL. MaraschiB. MarcoteM. MariottiM. MartínezD. MazinU. MenzelJ. M. MirandaR. MirzoyanA. MoralejoP. Munar-AdroverD. NakajimaA. NiedzwieckiK. NilssonK. NishijimaK. NodaR. OritoA. OverkempingS. PaianoM. PalatielloD. PanequeR. PaolettiJ. M. ParedesX. Paredes-FortunyM. PersicP. G. Prada MoroniE. PrandiniI. PuljakR. ReinthalW. RhodeM. RibóJ. RicoJ. Rodriguez GarciaS. RügamerT. SaitoK. SaitoK. SataleckaV. ScalzottoV. ScapinC. SchultzT. SchweizerS. N. ShoreA. SillanpääJ. SitarekI. SnidaricD. SobczynskaF. SpanierV. StamatescuA. StamerraT. SteinbringJ. StorzM. StrzysL. TakaloH. TakamiF. TavecchioP. TemnikovT. TerzićD. TescaroM. TeshimaJ. ThaeleO. TibollaD. F. TorresT. ToyamaA. TrevesM. UellenbeckP. VoglerR. ZaninJ. MartinM. A. Pérez-Torres

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.