Paper detail

Discovery of Multi-Phase Cold Accretion in a Massive Galaxy at z=0.7

We present detailed photo+collisional ionization models and kinematic models of the multi-phase absorbing gas, detected within the HST/COS, HST/STIS, and Keck/HIRES spectra of the background quasar TON 153, at 104 kpc along the projected minor axis of a star-forming spiral galaxy (z=0.6610). Complementary g'r'i'Ks photometry and stellar population models indicate that the host galaxy is dominated by a 4 Gyr stellar population with slightly greater than solar metallicity and has an estimated log(M*)=11 and a log(Mvir)=13. Photoionization models of the low ionization absorption, (MgI, SiII, MgII and CIII) which trace the bulk of the hydrogen, constrain the multi-component gas to be cold (logT=3.8-5.2) and metal poor (-1.68<[X/H]<-1.64). A lagging halo model reproduces the low ionization absorption kinematics, suggesting gas coupled to the disk angular momentum, consistent with cold accretion mode material in simulations. The CIV and OVI absorption is best modeled in a separate collisionally ionized metal-poor (-2.50<[X/H]<-1.93) warm phase with logT=5.3. Although their kinematics are consistent with a wind model, given the 2-2.5dex difference between the galaxy stellar metallicity and the absorption metallicity indicates the gas cannot arise from galactic winds. We discuss and conclude that although the quasar sight-line passes along the galaxy minor axis at projected distance of 0.3 virial radii, well inside its virial shock radius, the combination of the relative kinematics, temperatures, and relative metallicities indicated that the multi-phase absorbing gas arises from cold accretion around this massive galaxy. Our results appear to contradict recent interpretations that absorption probing the projected minor axis of a galaxy is sampling winds.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.