Paper detail

Discovery Of Copper Catalyst For New Chemical Polishing Acid On Superconducting Niobium

High field Q-slope (HFQS) seriously limits the high gradient performance of the buffered chemically polished (BCP) superconducting radio frequency (SRF) niobium cavities. The direct cause or mechanism is not yet fully understood. In our recent extensive data analysis, we concluded that the potential root cause could be nitrogen contamination on the surface. The nitric contamination could be created by nitric acid during BCP which uses the mixture of hydrofluoric acid, nitric acid, and phosphoric acid. Based on this thought, we started to develop a new chemical polishing acid that replaces the nitric acid by hydrogen peroxide. We have discovered that this new acid cannot provide smooth surface finishing, however adding copper catalyst allows this acid to provide a smooth surface similar to or even better than that from the conventional BCP. This paper first shows the significance of resolving HFQS, then summarizes our extensive data analysis results, and finally describes our discovery of the copper catalyst.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.