Paper detail

Discovery of a periodical apoastron GeV peak in LS I +61°303

Aims. The aim of this paper is to analyse the previously discovered discontinuity of the periodicity of the GeV $γ$-ray emission of the radio-loud X-ray binary LS I +61°303 and to determine its physical origin. Methods. We used wavelet analysis to explore the temporal development of periodic signals. The wavelet analysis was first applied to the whole data set of available Fermi-LAT data and then to the two subsets of orbital phase intervals $Φ= 0.0 - 0.5$ and $Φ= 0.5 - 1.0$. We also performed a Lomb-Scargle timing Analysis. We investigated the similarities between GeV $γ$-ray emission and radio emission by comparing the folded curves of the Fermi-LAT data and the Green Bank Interferometer radio data. Results. During the epochs when the timing analysis fails to determine the orbital periodicity, the periodicity is present in the two orbital phase intervals $Φ= 0.0 - 0.5$ and $Φ= 0.5 - 1.0$. That is, there are two periodical signals, one towards periastron (i.e., $Φ= 0.0 - 0.5$) and another one towards apoastron ($Φ= 0.5 - 1.0$). The apoastron peak seems to be affected by the same orbital shift as the radio outbursts and, in addition, reveals the same two periods $P_1$ and $P_2$ that are present in the radio data. Conclusions. The $γ$-ray emission of the apoastron peak normally just broadens the emission of the peak around periastron. Only when it appears at $Φ\approx 0.8 - 1.0$, because of the orbital shift, it is enough detached from the first peak to become recognisable as a second orbital peak, which is the reason why the timing analysis fails. Two $γ$-ray peaks along the orbit are predicted by the two-peak accretion model for an eccentric orbit, that was proposed by several authors for LS I +61°303.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.