Paper detail

Discovery of a Bimodal Environmental Distribution of Compact Ellipticals in the Local Universe

Low-mass compact stellar systems (CSSs; $M_{\star}$ $<$ 10$^{10}$ M$_{\odot}$) are thought to be a mixed bag of objects with various formation mechanisms. Previous surveys of CSSs were biased to relatively high-density environments and cannot provide a complete view of the environmental dependence of the formation of CSSs. We conduct the first-ever unbiased flux-limited census of nearby quiescent CSSs over a total sky area of $\sim$ 200 deg$^{2}$ observed by the GAMA spectroscopic survey. The complete sample includes 82 quiescent CSSs, of which 85\% fall within the stellar mass range of classical compact ellipticals (cEs).\ By quantifying the local environment with the normalized projected distance $D/R_{\rm vir}$ to the nearest luminous neighboring galaxy, we find that these CSSs have a bimodal $D/R_{\rm vir}$ distribution, with one group peaking near $\sim$ 0.1$\times$$R_{\rm vir}$ (satellite) and the other peaking near $\sim$ 10$\times$$R_{\rm vir}$ (field). In contrast to the CSSs, ordinary quiescent galaxies of similar masses have unimodal $D/R_{\rm vir}$ distribution.\ Satellite CSSs are older and more metal-rich than field CSSs on average. The bimodal $D/R_{\rm vir}$ distribution of quiescent CSSs reinforces the existence of two distinct formation channels (tidal stripping and born-to-be) for cEs and may be understood in two mutually inclusive perspectives, i.e., substantial tidal stripping happens only when satellite galaxies travel sufficiently close to their massive hosts, and there exists an excess of high-density cE-bearing subhalos close to massive halos.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.