Paper detail

Discovery of >350 GeV Gamma Rays from the BL Lacertae Object 1ES 2344+514

We present the discovery of >350 GeV gamma-ray emission from the BL Lacertae object 1ES 2344+514 with the Whipple Observatory 10m gamma-ray telescope. This is the third BL Lac object detected at gamma-ray energies above 300 Gev, the other two being Markarian 421 (Mrk 421) and Mrk501. These three active galactic nuclei are all X-ray selected and have the lowest known redshifts of any BL Lac objects currently identified. The evidence for emission derives primarily from an apparent flare on December 20, 1995 when a 6 sigma excess was detected with a flux approximately 63% of the very high energy gamma-ray emission from the Crab Nebula, the standard candle for TeV gamma-ray sources. Excluding the flare, observations between October 1995 and January 1996 yield a 4 sigma detection corresponding to 11% of the VHE Crab Nebula flux. Observations spanning September 1996 to January 1997 failed to yield a significant detection of a steady flux or any flaring. For this period, the 99.9% confidence level upper limit is <8% of the Crab Nebula. The low baseline emission level and variations in nightly and yearly flux of 1ES 22344+514 are the same as the VHE emission characteristics of Mrk 421 and Mrk 501

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access34 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.