Paper detail

Discovering universal scaling laws in 3D printing of metals with genetic programming and dimensional analysis

We leverage dimensional analysis and genetic programming (a type of machine learning) to discover two strikingly simple but universal scaling laws, which remain accurate for different materials, processing conditions, and machines in metal three-dimensional (3D) printing. The first one is extracted from high-fidelity high-speed synchrotron X-ray imaging, and defines a new dimensionless number, Keyhole number, to predict melt-pool vapor depression depth. The second predicts porosity using the Keyhole number and another dimensionless number, normalized energy density. By reducing the dimensions of these longstanding problems, the low-dimensional scaling laws will aid process optimization and defect elimination, and potentially lead to a quantitative predictive framework for the critical issues in metal 3D printing. Moreover, the method itself is broadly applicable to a range of scientific areas.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.