Paper detail

Discovering Superhard B-N-O Compounds by Iterative Machine Learning and Evolutionary Structure Predictions

We search for new superhard B-N-O compounds with an iterative machine learning (ML) procedure, where ML models are trained using sample crystal structures from evolutionary algorithm. We first use cohesive energy to evaluate the thermodynamic stability of varying B$_x$N$_y$O$_z$ compositions, and then gradually focus on compositional regions with high cohesive energy and high hardness. The results converge quickly after a few iterations. Our resulting ML models show that B$_{x+2}$N$_{x}$O$_{3}$ compounds with $x \geq 3$ (like B$_5$N$_3$O$_3$, B$_6$N$_4$O$_3$, etc.) are potentially superhard and thermodynamically favorable. Our meta-GGA density functional theory calculations indicate that these materials are also wide bandgap ($\ge 4.4$ eV) insulators, with the valence band maximum related to the $p$-orbitals of nitrogen atoms near vacant sites. This study demonstrates that an iterative method combining ML and ab initio simulations provides a powerful tool for discovering novel materials.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.