Paper detail

Disagreement and Polarization in Two-Party Social Networks

We investigate disagreement and polarization in a social network with two polarizing sources of information. First, we define disagreement and polarization indices in two-party leader-follower models of opinion dynamics. We then give expressions for the indices in terms of a graph Laplacian. The expressions show a relationship between these quantities and the concepts of resistance distance and biharmonic distance. We next study the problem of designing the network so as to minimize disagreement and polarization. We give conditions for optimal disagreement and polarization, and further, we show that a linear combination of disagreement and polarization of the follower nodes is a convex function of the edge weights between followers. We propose algorithms to address some related continuous and discrete optimization problems and also present analytic results for some interesting examples.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.