Paper detail

Direct Wavelet Expansion of the Primordial Power Spectrum

In order to constrain and possibly detect unusual physics during inflation, we allow the power spectrum of primordial matter density fluctuations, P_{in}(k), to be an arbitrary function in the estimation of cosmological parameters from data. The multi-resolution and good localization properties of orthogonal wavelets make them suitable for detecting features in P_{in}(k). We expand P_{in}(k) directly in wavelet basis functions. The likelihood of the data is thus a function of the wavelet coefficients of P_{in}(k), as well as the H_0, Ω_b h^2, $Ω_c h^2 and the τ_{ri}, in a flat $Λ$CDM cosmology. We derive constraints on these parameters from CMB anisotropy data (WMAP, CBI, and ACBAR) and large scale structure (LSS) data (2dFGRS and PSCZ) using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique. The direct wavelet expansion method is different and complimentary to the wavelet band power method of Mukherjee & Wang (2003a,b), and results from the two methods are consistent. In addition, as we demonstrate, the direct wavelet expansion method has the advantage that once the wavelet coefficients have been constrained, the reconstruction of P_{in}(k) can be effectively denoised, i.e., P_{in}(k) can be reconstructed using only the coefficients that, say, deviate from zero at greater than 1σ. In doing so the essential properties of P_{in}(k) are retained. The reconstruction also suffers much less from the correlated errors of binning methods. The shape of the primordial power spectrum, as reconstructed in detail here, reveals an interesting new feature at 0.001 \la k/{Mpc}^{-1} \la 0.005. It will be interesting to see if this feature is confirmed by future data. The reconstructed and denoised P_{in}(k) is favored over the scale-invariant and power-law forms at \ga 1σ.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.