Paper detail

Direct versus indirect band gap emission and exciton-exciton annihilation in atomically thin molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe$_2$)

We probe the room temperature photoluminescence of $N$-layer molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe$_2$) in the continuous wave (cw) regime. The photoluminescence quantum yield of monolayer MoTe$_2$ is three times larger than in bilayer MoTe$_2$ and forty times greater than in the bulk limit. Mono- and bilayer MoTe$_2$ display almost symmetric emission lines at $1.10~\rm eV$ and $1.07~\rm eV$, respectively, which predominantly arise from direct radiative recombination of the A exciton. In contrast, $N\geq3-$layer MoTe$_2$ exhibits a much reduced photoluminescence quantum yield and a broader, redshifted and seemingly bimodal photoluminescence spectrum. The low- and high-energy contributions are attributed to emission from the indirect and direct optical band gaps, respectively. Bulk MoTe$_2$ displays a broad emission line with a dominant contribution at 0.94~eV that is assigned to emission from the indirect optical band gap. As compared to related systems (such as MoS$_2$, MoSe$_2$, WS$_2$ and WSe$_2$), the smaller energy difference between the monolayer direct optical band gap and the bulk indirect optical band gap leads to a smoother increase of the photoluminescence quantum yield as $N$ decreases. In addition, we study the evolution of the photoluminescence intensity in monolayer MoTe$_2$ as a function of the exciton formation rate $W_\mathrm{abs}$ up to $3.6\times 10^{22}~\rm{cm}^{-2} s^{-1}$. The lineshape of the photoluminescence spectrum remains largely independent of $W_\mathrm{abs}$, whereas the photoluminescence intensity grows sub-linearly above $W_\mathrm{abs}\sim 10^{21}~\rm cm^{-2} s^{-1}$. This behavior is assigned to exciton-exciton annihilation and is well-captured by an elementary rate equation model.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.