Paper detail

Direct Three-body Triple-$α$ in Helium Novae

In AM CVn binaries, a white dwarf primary accretes material from a helium-rich white dwarf or stellar companion. The unstable ignition of nuclear burning via the $3α$ reaction in an accumulated helium layer powers a thermonuclear runaway near accretion rates $\dot{M} \lesssim 10^{-6} \, \mathrm{M_{\odot} \ yr^{-1}}$ that may be observed as helium nova or .Ia supernova. Helium burning in the primary's envelope at temperatures $T \lesssim 10^{8} \, \mathrm{K}$ may proceed via the direct three-body fusion of $α$-particles. Here we show that the direct three-body rate by Nguyen et al. (2012) -- which is reduced relative to the extrapolated resonant rate at temperatures $T \gtrsim 5 \times 10^{7} \, \mathrm{K}$ -- results in novae with longer recurrence times and larger ignition masses. By contrast, we find that the enhancement in the direct three-body rate at temperatures below $T \lesssim 5 \times 10^{7} \, \mathrm{K}$ does not result in significant differences in nova outburst properties. The most massive envelopes in our models are near the density threshold for detonation of the helium layer, where an increase in the density at ignition due to the $3α$ rate may be important.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.