Paper detail

Direct numerical simulations of the modified Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations for the charging dynamics of cylindrical electrolyte-filled pores

Understanding how electrolyte-filled porous electrodes respond to an applied potential is important to many electrochemical technologies. Here, we consider a model supercapacitor of two blocking cylindrical pores on either side of a cylindrical electrolyte reservoir. A stepwise potential difference $2Φ$ between the pores drives ionic fluxes in the setup, which we study through the modified Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations, solved with finite elements. We focus our discussion on the dominant timescales with which the pores charge and how these timescales depend on three dimensionless numbers. Next to the dimensionless applied potential $Φ$, we consider the ratio $R/R_b$ of the pore's resistance $R$ to the bulk reservoir resistance $R_b$ and the ratio $r_{p}/λ$ of the pore radius $r_p$ to the Debye length $λ$. We compare our data to theoretical predictions by Aslyamov and Janssen ($Φ$), Posey and Morozumi ($R/R_b$), and Henrique, Zuk, and Gupta ($r_{p}/λ$). Through our numerical approach, we delineate the validity of these theories and the assumptions on which they were based.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.