Paper detail

Direct measurement of evolving dark energy density and super-accelerating expansion of the universe

A higher value of Hubble constant has been obtained from measurements with nearby Type Ia supernovae, than that obtained at much higher redshift. With the peculiar motions of their hosts, we find that the matter content at such low redshift is only about 10% of that at much higher redshifts; such a low matter density cannot be produced from density perturbations in the background of the ΛCDM expansion. Recently the Planck team has reported a lower Hubble constant and a higher matter content. We find that the dark energy density increases with cosmic time, so that its equation-of-state parameter decreases with cosmic time and is less than -1 at low redshift. Such dark energy evolution is responsible for driving the super-accelerating expansion of the universe. In this extended ΛCDM model, the cosmological redshift represents time rather than radial coordinate, so that the universe complies to the Copernican Principle.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.