Paper detail

Direct evaluation of measurement uncertainties by feedback compensation of decoherence

It is difficult to evaluate the precision of quantum measurements because it is not possible to conduct a second reference measurement on the same physical system to compare the measurement outcome with a more accurate value of the measured quantity. Here, I show that a direct evaluation of measurement uncertainties is possible when the measurement outcomes are used to compensate the small amount of decoherence induced in a probe qubit by carefully controlled interactions with the system. Since the original uncertainty of the target observable causes fluctuating phase shifts in the probe qubit, any additional information obtained about the target observable can be used to compensate a part of the decoherence by applying a conditional phase shift to the reference qubit. The magnitude of this negative feedback corresponds to an estimate of the target observable, and the uncompensated decoherence defines the uncertainty of that estimate. The results of the analysis show that the uncertainties of the estimates are given by the uncertainties introduced by Ozawa in Phys. Rev. A 67, 042105 (2003) and the optimal estimates are given by the weak values associated with the different measurement outcomes. Feedback compensation of decoherence therefore demonstrates the empirical validity of definitions of errors and estimates that combine the initial information of the input state with the additional information provided by each measurement outcome.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.